• 목록
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Mindy Seu (b. 1991, California) is a designer and technologist based in New York City. Her expanded practice involves archival projects, techno-essential writing, performative lectures, design commissions, and shut collaborations. Her newest writing surveys feminist economies, historic precursors of the metaverse, and the materiality of the web. Mindy’s ongoing Cyberfeminism Index, which gathers three a long time of on-line activism and net artwork, was commissioned by Rhizome, presented at the new Museum, and awarded the Graham Foundation Grant. She has lectured internationally at cultural establishments (Barbican Centre, New Museum), tutorial institutions (Columbia University, Central Saint Martins), and mainstream platforms (Pornhub, SSENSE, Google), and been a resident at MacDowell, Sitterwerk Foundation, Pioneer Works, and Internet Archive. Her design commissions and consultation embrace tasks for the Serpentine Gallery, Canadian Centre for Architecture, and MIT Media Lab. Her work has been featured in Frieze, Dazed, Gagosian Quarterly, Brooklyn Rail, i-D, and more. Mindy holds an M.Des. Harvard’s Graduate School of Design and a B.A. Design Media Arts from the University of California, Los Angeles. She is at the moment Assistant Professor at Rutgers Mason Gross School of the Arts and Critic at Yale School of Art.

Now, take a moment to watch among the demo. I ask you, is that not a powerful thing? Does it not look fairly nice, even by today’s standards? By all measures, it was a technical marvel and an excellent user experience. But it surely failed - bitterly. Bell Telephone’s plans for the PicturePhone were formidable, if not outright delusional. The price of a PicturePhone plan was $160/month. Today, flagship mobile phones promote at around $one thousand a piece, however might you imagine paying that value each month for service? That’s what $160 would have felt like in 1970. Bell arrange PicturePhone booths in New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. 20/minute to use them. When was the final time you dropped $150 in a vending machine? That’s the sort of expense we’re talking about. As batshit because the economics of the PicturePhone had been, Bell’s purpose was to construct a $1 Billion company - 100,000 PicturePhones in the primary 5 years; 1,000,000 by 1980; 12,000,000 by 2000. Despite making an amazing piece of gear and really dazzling the technorati of the time by making it work properly over old, twisted copper wire, that was never going to happen.

Today, it’s simple to ask why Bell wouldn’t have just subsidized the product in the early days to construct the market. The reply is regulation. At the time, Bell owned many of the infrastructure - the community over which the PicturePhone was transmitting. Taking a loss on the machine to lock in clients would have triggered an enormous antitrust case, and nicely, back then companies actually cared about that sort of factor and so did the government. So, the PicturePhone was pressured to be exorbitantly expensive. Though an economic misfit, the PicturePhone was a superb machine and a fair higher catalyst. Researchers at Bell Labs knew that a digital future was at hand, and that new infrastructure would be required to assist it. Several years earlier than the PicturePhone was launched, Bell produced a movie representing their view of the longer term, known as Seeing the Digital Future, which anticipated a lot of today’s digital and internet-pushed tradition.

Creating the PicturePhone allowed them to experiment with a number of the interactions they expected would develop into commonplace, whereas also demonstrating the necessity for upgraded infrastructure. That Bell engineers were in a position to ship a system that transmitted strong sound and image over existing telelphone traces was extraordinary. That they have been capable of create such a compact, desk-prepared gadget that was appropriate with the telephones already sitting on them was additionally. That the PicturePhone had a digital camera that used real glass optics and was refocusable and repositionable remotely makes me covet it, even now. Beyond those options, the PicturePhone released in 1970 anticipated much of today’s web experience. Fluid and frequent digital connections between people, absolutely, but additionally the multimedia nature of how we alternate data in the present day. Bell added video to what had been a completely auditory connection experience thus far, however they also built add-ons to attach PicturePhone to mainframe computer systems, share slides over the display screen, and even a mirror module that will permit the unit’s digital camera to broadcast documents you had on your desk.

Undeniably cool, though admittedly niche for the time. Bell hoped that gaining a country’s worth of subscribers would pressure a nationwide improve in digital infrastructure. As it could turn out, even the internet, as we realize it as we speak, wouldn’t do this. We would have to distribute credit score for making the common American perceive the need for fiber optic cable among a various constituency - from Google to Pornhub. Pricing and infrastructure can be blamed for what would turn into a $500 million loss for Bell Telephone. Even that number doesn’t really describe how a lot of a misfire the PicturePhone was in contrast with the truth that in the primary 6 months, solely 12 clients subscribed to the service, and by the point it was officially canceled, it had exactly zero of these clients left. But even in 1970, there were more than 12 people wealthy sufficient to be early adopters. So why didn’t they?